• Austin SEO
    • TastyPlacement in the Press
    • Meet the Team
  • Blog
  • Services
    • SEO Services
      • WordPress SEO Service
      • Magento SEO Services
      • Conversion Rate Optimization
      • Why Google Certification Matters
    • PPC & Adwords
      • Adwords & PPC Management
      • Remarketing Services
      • Display Ad Management
      • Facebook Ad Management
      • Pinterest Ad Management
      • Google Ad Grants Management for Non-Profits
      • Adwords App Install Ad Management
      • Product Listing Ad Management
    • Analytics & Data
      • Analytics and Monitoring
      • Google Tag Manager Experts
      • Data Studio Development & Consulting
    • Social Media & Local Marketing
      • Social Media Marketing
      • Local SEO
    • Web Development
      • Mobile Website Design
      • WordPress Development
  • Case Studies
    • SEO Case Studies
      • SEO Case Study: We Beat Lowes, Then We Beat Home Depot
      • SEO Case Study: Total Domination in Houston for Medical Provider
    • Analytics Case Studies
      • Case Study: Updated Design Yields 43% Increase in Conversion Rate
      • Case Study: PPC Optimization Yields Tripled Conversion Rate
    • Social Media Case Studies
      • Social Media Case Study: Hundreds of New Customers From Core Facebook Campaign
  • Portfolios
    • Display Ad Portfolio
    • Design Portfolio
    • Infographic Portfolio
    • SEO Testimonials
  • Contact
    • New Customers: Get to Know Us
    • Customer Service & Support
    • Referral Program
    • SEO Training Seminars
    • Job: Paid Search/PPC/Adwords Analyst
    • Job: Local Digital Marketing Specialist
    • Job: SEO/Marketing Junior Analyst
    • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: SEO

Keyword Density – Testing Master Pages

December 2, 2008/10 Comments/in SEO/by Michael David

In this post, we analyze a few pages from SEO masters to see if we can divine a magical formula for keyword density.

First, a quick definition. Keyword density is the frequency of a particular search phrase within a body of text or element within a web page. If a keyword phrase appears 100 times within the body of a web page with 1000 words, this frequency represents a keyword density of 10%.

I recently began thinking about keyword density after researching the question and learning that very few experts agree on the proper percentage of keyword density needed to achieve superior search engine results for a given keyphrase. So, we set out to run some analysis on a high-value, highly competitive search phrase to see what we could learn about keyword density. We selected the top search engine results pages and ran the results through a keyword density analyzer; we tabulated the results below.

How to Test Keyword Density: What Keyphrase to Test?

Our test had a few parameters:

  1. First, the search phrase had to be something that was competitive. We wanted to test a search phrase that the SEO’ers had worked hard to optimize. A competitive phrase was more likely to have been tested and retested to obtain high rankings.
  2. Second, we wanted a phrase from within the world of SEO–again, a phrase that was worked by its handlers, people that are versed in the idea of keyword density.
  3. So, we settled on the phrase “SEO Expert”.

We Googled our sample test phrase and sure enough, the top results were from easily recognized names in the world of SEO. The number 1 result was Brad Fallon’s (of the StomperNet SEO education courses) page, BradFallon.com.

And here are the top 3 search results for the search phrase “SEO Expert” (using a Chrome browser):

  1. www.bradfallon.com
  2. www.top10seotips.com/seo_expert.htm
  3. www.mrwebguru.com

Keyword Density – Running the Analysis

The table that follows shows the keyword density analysis for the top 3 performing pages for “SEO Expert” for a variety of HTML elements. We have also included the total number of on-page words.

Attribute Where “SEO Expert” Appears bradfallon.com
(% Keyword Density)
Top10SEOTips (% Keyword Density) Mr.WebGuru (% Keyword Density)
Title Tag 44% 22.2% 28.6%
Body Text 0.1% 4.1% 1%
(Total Words in Body Text) 1744 1228 1366
H1/H2/H3 Tags 0% 23.5% 25%
Link Text 0.2% 11.8 3.1%
Bolded Body Text 0% 40% 0%
Meta Description 0% 14.8% 7.4%
Meta Keywords 0% 100% 0%

What It Means, and Solving the Riddle

These results intrigued me–at first. Top10SEOTips and Mr.WebGuru’s keyword densities, while for the most part relatively equal, bear almost no relation to the number 1 result, BradFallon.com.

First, with respect to Top10SEOTips and Mr.WebGuru, the results make sense. Sure, there are some differences: Mr.WebGuru has no Meta Keyword for “SEO Expert” and has no bolded body text. Nevertheless, the similarities between these two pages are striking: the keyword densities for Title Tags (22 vs. 28%) Total Word Count (1228 vs. 1366), and H1/H2/H3 Tags (23.5% vs. 25%) are nearly equal.

Meanwhile, Brad Fallon hardly seems to be trying–hence the riddle. Except for a very high keyword density in BradFallon.com’s Title Tag, the search phrase hardly appears at all. And, a reading and review of the pages themselves makes quite clear that Top10SEOTips and Mr.WebGuru are highly focused and hyper-optimized pages, while BradFallon.com is simply a blog front page which displays his 10 most recent posts.
So why does BradFallon.com rank so well for “SEO Expert” when his on-page keyword density is near zero? The answer lies in the number of backlinks that each page enjoys.

bradfallon.com Top10SEOTips Mr.WebGuru
Inbound Links/Backlinks 16,178 661 733

As this table shows, BradFallon.com enjoys a tremendous number of backlinks, more than 10 times the 2nd and 3rd results combined. BradFallon.com’s backlinks obviously “brute forced” the search rankings and pushed it to the top of the results–despite BradFallon.com’s lack of specific optimization for the phrase “SEO Expert”.

Keyword Density: The Lesson

But we set out to learn about keyword density–we already know backlinks are important. Setting aside BradFallon.com, the 2nd and 3rd ranked sites offer a valuable lesson. These highly tested pages are obviously finely honed–and thus the keyword density percentages that appear on these pages are a valuable and reliable benchmark that I’ll use going forward–at least until I can get 16,000 backlinks.

-Michael

How Does Google Local Order Its Results?

July 26, 2008/3 Comments/in Local Maps and Local Listings/by Michael David

How Does Google Local Order Its Results?

February 2015 Update:

We originally published this post in July of 2008. Since then, ranking in Google Local is more elusive, and a more complex algorithm is applied to local rankings. So, the team at our little Austin-based digital marketing agency updated this post as noted.

Want to improve your search ranking in Google Maps? We offer a Local SEO/Google Maps Ranking Service.

I believe deeply in Google Local. I believe that Google Local will, in a few short years from now, overcome and eclipse yellowbook, yellowpages.com, superpages, citysearch, or any other local business directory in print form or on the web (I wrote that when this post was first published in 2008 and yep, it came true -Michael David). Remember searching with InfoSeek? Google Local is a major shift in local business search; it’s coming hard, and it’s coming fast.

With Google’s foray into 411 directory information (800-GOOG-411) and it’s imminent consumer telephone service, it’s quite clear that Google Local is going to be much more than a small local directory. We commented on this paradigm shift in our post on Google’s 411 Directory Assistance service, when those outside the SEO community barely noticed.

The Increasing Value of Google Local Entries

Certainly, Google Local entries are becoming more valuable; Google has for a while inserted its local results–with obvious prominence–within its traditional natural results. Google Local is certainly a facet of SEO that is growing in importance week-by-week. And, once Google launches its telephone service, then Google Local may become more important than the traditional natural results for some businesses. And don’t forget that Google is busy perfecting its voice recognition system in conjunction with its 411 service.

Cell phones, voice recognition, geo-location, and location-sensitive search retrieval–all these factors are now conjoining. Google is obviously posturing for the inevitable day when a majority of searches are made by voice command rather than the pitter-patter of a computer keyboard.

And, just as optimizers have struggled to learn the secrets of Google’s natural results, so in the future may SEO’ers fight for top position in the Google Local results.

And so, we analyzed how the listing order for Google Local results is determined with an eye toward improving our results and the results of our clients. Here’s a hint: it’s not alphabetic.

Location Sensitivity in Google Local Results

Google Local entries do appear to be “location sensitive”, with increasing accuracy and importance. Obviously, the entire point of a local search is to deliver local results. And, zip code-based searches appear to be more “strict” than city name searches–Google has a patent to do with this that is so technical, I don’t even want to learn about it. Business locations near a city center may appear first in Local entries–but location is not the only factor, and location can easily be outweighed by both keywords and depth of the listing and reviews.

Keywords in the business name and title yield favorable Google Local results, as well as the use of keywords in the business description. That presents a clear opportunity to optimize through the development of a keyword-focused profile.

Local Results: The Effect of Customer Reviews

Finally, the local business results are certainly impacted by the number of reviews. A search for “austin restaurants” (from an Austin IP address) returns a prominent and inviting map with 10 local entries. The first two entries are Chuy’s (drool) and Stubb’s BBQ (drool, again), with 102 and 46 reviews, respectively. Scroll down, and the number of reviews drops.

Business owners with local listings would be wise to invite their happy customers to write reviews in the Google Local section. I am sure I will…

February 2015 Update: The effect of customer reviews is still felt, certainly, but is no longer such a sure bet. Customer reviews create a “trust factor”–Google wants to be assured that businesses are open for business, and reviews can confirm this. But with expanded criteria (read on for recent developments) customer reviews as a ranking factor are largely thought to be diluted. Coupled with that, Google’s algorithm for detecting reviews posted by the owner themselves has grown more sophisticated (thankfully). We observed a few companies in our local market of Austin TX with falsified reviews completely disappear from the map listing in the mid- to latter- part of 2009.


Feb. 2015 Update: How Does Google Local Order Its Results?, Part II

Google Maps/Local’s ranking factors have grown more complex, and frankly, we’ve learned a lot more about it in the past 20 months. So, we decided to expand and update this article with greater scope and depth.

Claiming Your Listing

Google provides a verification/claim process for “grabbing” a listing, or if one doesn’t exist, for claiming a listing. Ask yourself, does verification of a listing tend to corroborate that the underlying business’s contact information is correct and that the business is open?

Absolutely, and Google treats verification as a trust factor–claiming the listing establishes that your business is open and the information is current.

Use of Proper Categories

A well-used secret of the pros: select the categories wisely and based on the proper relevant keyword groups. Google’s category selection has gone through many phases: In early 2008, the system forced you to select pre-existing categories–even if those categories did not describe your business accurately. Then, in early 2009, Google went to a free-form category system: Submitters were allowed to create any category name desired. This led to some keyword stuffing, and when the dust finally settled (at least for the time being) Google now requires you to select one pre-existing category, but then allows up to 4 free-form categories.

Best practice? Pick the pre-existing category for your main line of business, and choose your free-form categories based on some secondary keywords that identify your products.

Use of Product/Service Keyword in Local Business Listing Title

If your business is gutter  cleaning, and your business listing title is “Austin Gutter Cleaning”–you’ll likely rank well for searches for gutter cleaning in Austin. This factor is necessary, but has led to rampant abuse. Some categories are dominated by companies that have stuffed their title with search terms. There is a fine art to incorporating keywords in a natural way without appearing as blatant spam. I would expect Google to algorithmically improve its detection of keyword stuffing in the future. Perhaps the best approach to this factor is to use keywords in your business name from the get-go and not try to keyword stuff your way into the rankings.

Keywords in Description (and Even Having a Description)

I remain amazed that companies with ongoing, expensive SEO campaigns have incomplete or poorly written descriptions in their listings. Google gives you the space to describe your product/service–use it. If you sell recumbent bikes–make sure that term appears in your local business description.

Phone Numbers: Local, Exclusive, and Consistent

Use local area codes/numbers, not 800 numbers unless you are a national brand.  Also, don’t share phone numbers between local listings like two locations or two different business names: that erodes trust. Also, the phone number that you use in your local listing should also appear on the destination page (your website referenced in the local listing)–that way Google can corroborate the number in it’s directory as current and accurate.

Master Ranking Factor: KML File and Geo-Sitemap

For skilled programmers and web designers, an integrated Geo-Sitemap and associated KML file on the business’s website for Google and Yahoo to spider establishes trust and authenticity. The Geo-Sitemap/KML protocol is a standard by which you can identify the physical location of your business in a standard file format. We’ve seen this technique work quite well in competitive markets. The how-to, however, does require some coding skill as well as use of Google’s Webmaster tool, and thus is beyond the scope of this article.

Master Ranking Factor: hCard Microformat/Schema

Another factor available to skilled programmers is the inclusion of the hCard microformat on the destination website. The hCard format is a standardized protocol for displaying contact information. Google and Yahoo have both announced their support for this format. This factor enjoys less weight than the major ranking factors. We implement this in competitive markets for that extra push.

Master Ranking Factor: Corroboration in Other Local Directories

Think like a search engine for a moment: If you had a local listing for a business, and (since you are a search engine and crawl other sites) you find that business listed on other local directories/internet yellow pages with the same phone number/address/etc. That would tend to mean the business in your directory was 1) Popular, and 2) Still open for business, right? Absolutely yes.

Now imagine the converse: no corroboration in other popular internet directories, or worse: conflicting information–what would that say? It’s obvious: when Google finds corroborative information from other sources, it rewards those listings as trustworthy.

But to implement this important ranking factor, you’ll need to get busy: the number of relevant, high-value local directories and internet yellow pages sources is growing rapidly, while at the same time the number of low-value, worthless directories (and even some scams surrounding directory listings) is also growing rapidly. Among the scams we’ve run into (because we’ve worked on hundreds of local listings) are:

  • The Yellow Pages Renewal Scam. You’ll want to search the ‘net for information on this one if you are interested, but it’s essentially a “do you wish to continue your existing listing?” pitch. If you say yes, you are invoiced for 600 or 700 dollars.
  • The Google Local Scam. This scam is an inbound call claiming that either 1) your Google local listing is subject to deletion or 2) offering paid position in Google Maps. Google Maps is free, and any threat of removal is fraudulent.

Lightweight Ranking Factors: Videos and Pictures

I typically try to use all the spaces for photos and include a video if one exists. I see that more robust profiles tend to outrank more incomplete profiles. But this is a factor with less weight: you aren’t going to rocket to position #1 in a competitive market simply by adding pictures.

Lightweight Ranking Factor: The Recent Claim Bump

Some pros describe a slight effect to the recent claiming of a listing–the listing bumps up but then perhaps dissipates with time. But since you’ll be claiming your listing anyway, you’ll cover this base.

Lightweight Ranking Factor: Pagerank of Destination Homepage

Remember that you’ll identify your business’s website in the Google local profile. The Google Pagerank (PR) value of your destination page is widely regarded to be a factor in the ranking of the corresponding local listing. After all, Google’s natural ranking algorithm rewards high-Pagerank sites with great placement in natural search–why not in local listings as well?

Negative Google Local Ranking Factors

The following are widely regarding as negative ranking factors:

  • Using an 800 number with no local phone number.
  • Multiple locations can confuse the search engines, and handling several locations without the help of an experienced pro can lead to merged and buried listings.
  • Post Office boxes without any physical address.

The Other Factors

Yes, there are other factors–though more moderate in weight and effect.

Want to improve your search ranking in Google Maps? We offer a Google Maps Ranking Service.
Page 4 of 41234

Tutorials & Case Studies

  • Analytics
  • Backlink Strategies
  • Case Studies
  • Infographics
  • Internet Marketing
  • Local Maps and Local Listings
  • Magento
  • Mobile SEO
  • Our Book: SEO for Wordpress
  • PPC
  • Programming & PHP
  • SEO
  • SEO Power Tools
  • SEO Resources
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Updates & News
  • Web Design
  • WordPress

Our Most Recent Tutorials & Case Studies

  • Test Results: How to Stop Google Re-Writing Your Title Tags in the SERPs
  • Pro Tip: Track Your Website Goals in Google Analytics (and More)
  • How to Connect Google DataStudio to MySQL Database (cPanel Flavor)
  • UTM Codes/Tags: A Quick Guide to Tagging Ads Like a Pro
  • Social Media Case Study: Hundreds of New Customers From Core Facebook Campaign

Search

Archives & Tutorial Categories

  • Analytics
  • Backlink Strategies
  • Case Studies
  • Infographics
  • Internet Marketing
  • Local Maps and Local Listings
  • Magento
  • Mobile SEO
  • Our Book: SEO for Wordpress
  • PPC
  • Programming & PHP
  • SEO
  • SEO Power Tools
  • SEO Resources
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Updates & News
  • Web Design
  • WordPress

Austin SEO Company, TastyPlacement

TastyPlacement
4150 Freidrich Ln Ste C
Austin, TX 78744
Tel: (512) 535-2492

Google Maps: Get Directions or Read Our Awesome Reviews

Quick Navigation: Our Most Important Pages

  • Austin SEO [Home]
  • WordPress SEO Service
  • PPC Management
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Analytics and Monitoring
  • Remarketing Experts
  • Conversion Rate Optimization
© Copyright - TastyPlacement. Made in Austin, Texas
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Scroll to top