• Austin SEO
    • TastyPlacement in the Press
    • Meet the Team
  • Blog
  • Services
    • SEO Services
      • WordPress SEO Service
      • Magento SEO Services
      • Conversion Rate Optimization
      • Why Google Certification Matters
    • PPC & Adwords
      • Adwords & PPC Management
      • Remarketing Services
      • Display Ad Management
      • Facebook Ad Management
      • Pinterest Ad Management
      • Google Ad Grants Management for Non-Profits
      • Adwords App Install Ad Management
      • Product Listing Ad Management
    • Analytics & Data
      • Analytics and Monitoring
      • Google Tag Manager Experts
      • Data Studio Development & Consulting
    • Social Media & Local Marketing
      • Social Media Marketing
      • Local SEO
    • Web Development
      • Mobile Website Design
      • WordPress Development
  • Case Studies
    • SEO Case Studies
      • SEO Case Study: We Beat Lowes, Then We Beat Home Depot
      • SEO Case Study: Total Domination in Houston for Medical Provider
    • Analytics Case Studies
      • Case Study: Updated Design Yields 43% Increase in Conversion Rate
      • Case Study: PPC Optimization Yields Tripled Conversion Rate
    • Social Media Case Studies
      • Social Media Case Study: Hundreds of New Customers From Core Facebook Campaign
  • Portfolios
    • Display Ad Portfolio
    • Design Portfolio
    • Infographic Portfolio
    • SEO Testimonials
  • Contact
    • New Customers: Get to Know Us
    • Customer Service & Support
    • Referral Program
    • SEO Training Seminars
    • Job: Paid Search/PPC/Adwords Analyst
    • Job: Local Digital Marketing Specialist
    • Job: SEO/Marketing Junior Analyst
    • Privacy Policy & Terms of Use
  • Menu Menu

Tag Archive for: SEO

Siri Search Optimization

November 16, 2011/0 Comments/in Mobile SEO, SEO/by Michael David

You may have heard that the iPhone’s new voice-command and personal/search assistant “Siri” will be “the end of SEO as we know it.” Undoubtedly a shift is coming, but I for one doubt it will be as disruptive as the apocolyptos might have you believe. After all, we’re not all going to use only our phones for everything. We like our laptops, and in addition, bargain hunting (AKA commercial search) is deeply ingrained in human nature.

There are a lot of fun things Siri can do including transcribing text to voice, setting reminders, playing music, checking the weather, getting directions, and yes carrying out search queries. Undoubtedly, Siri will catch on like wildfire, and as a result will compete with many apps and tools, including search engines.

Optimizing for Siri

The integration of Siri will begin to affect strategies and optimization efforts, but most of these things should be part of an immersive SEO program from the start.

Local Search for Siri

People search from mobile devices on the move; they’re not sitting down to do in-depth research. A majority of mobile searches are location-specific including directions, finding nearby restaurants, or other local services.

With Siri, it’s not about people getting to your website through Google placement alone because visibility comes from other sources. Siri wants to give users a visual experience and draws data from local listing sites such as Yelp, Google Maps, Citysearch, YP, etc. There are more than 60 of these sites on which it is well worth your time to create a listing. It’s not just for Siri, getting listed on (and links from) all these sites improves local listing and organic placements in SERPs as well.

Obviously, you’ll want your information to be correct, up to date, and fully filled out on these sites with accurate address, phone number, images, positive reviews, and a high number of ratings. For more info on local optimization, check out our post on local listings SEO.

Rich Snippets and Schema Tags

Schema.org lets you use a specific markup language (web code) to identify specific information about your business and web presence and make that information more easily found by search engines.

Search engines are using on-page tags in a variety of ways. Google uses them to create rich snippets in search results and will continue to do so more and more. These snippets include author information, address, phone number, operating hours, and so on. So you can see how these tags have value to local searches such as are the focus of Siri. Offering a highly structured format for this information makes it that much easier to be found.

Variety in Linkbuilding and Long Tail Keywords

This is the first version of Siri, and its depth of language capabilities will continue to increase with new versions. Therefore the following effect will only continue to grow. Already, the length of Siri queries are longer because users are searching in natural speech rather than pecking away at keyboards or small iPhone touchscreens.

The result is more long-tail and highly targeted searches. Optimizing for long-tail means more words on the page and more flexible link building. Both of these strategies work in organic search as well, so you won’t even have to duplicate your efforts.

It used to be that you chose your anchor text and could simply bang away at it over and over. With enough links, you’d move on up. That hasn’t been best practice for a while, and Google is becoming even more focused on natural-looking anchor text profiles. Not only is this a safety-first method, but it’s also more efficient. Flexible anchor text (anchor text with the keyword integrated here and there, but also broadly varied) is more efficient in increasing rankings, even for the targeted, high-volume terms.

Back to Siri, the efforts you make to naturalize and get the most out of your link profile will also help you rank for long-tail searches, which Siri is all about. As a bonus, long tail searches are more targeted to the specific needs of a given search query and therefore convert at higher rates.

The iPhone 4s (S is for Siri? Seems that way to me…) is Apple’s best-selling phone to date, with 4 million sales in three days. Verizon started carrying the iPhone earlier this year and even Sprint has had no choice but to jump on the bandwagon. It’s a monolith, and it’s the impetus for a new fold of search optimization.

Highlights From PubCon Vegas 2011

November 11, 2011/0 Comments/in SEO/by Michael David

I’ve just returned from PubCon Las Vegas 2011 where I spoke on Hosting Issues and SEO, and Ways to Monetize a Blog. Bruce Clay’s staff did a great job of summarizing the Monetizing Your Blog segment, complete with some screenshots. It was a great conference with lots of national leaders in the disciplines of SEO, social media, and internet marketing.

Leo Laporte’s Keynote Address:
Marketing in the Social Era and the Future of Search

Leo Laporte is an Emmy Award winning veteran of technology broadcasting, and a great thinker with respect to internet and marketing. He had some noteworthy messages.

Leo offered some insights into where advertising and marketing has evolved to the present day. If we look back to say, 1890, and examine a Sears catalog, we’ll see basic descriptions of “features and benefits”–no marketing fluff there. But as the 20th Century progressed, marketers injected skill and technique to bend a product’s message to appeal to buyers on an emotional level, or to force brand identities upon consumers. An effective technique to be sure, but not necessarily in the interests of consumers. A related idea: “brands are the refuge of the ignorant.” In other words, a brand is what a consumer refers to when they have no true benchmark for the underlying quality or suitability of a product or service. More recently though, in the very recent few years, consumers have come to depend on online reviews, ratings and recommendations from their social circles to make buying decisions. This is a fundamental shift in purchasing motivation. As Leo notes, it’s as if the circle has closed and “features and benefits” now become the linchpin of purchasing decisions. He sees social media and websites with engaged users as the great drivers of purchasing decisions in the present and near future.

Leo also offered some predictions about the future of search engines and Google specifically. He does not feel that Google will be as relevant in the future and went as far to say that Google will have some serious challenges in the future. The example he gave was Apple’s new Siri app. Siri lets users speak a command like “find me a dentist near 78704”. Siri then completes the search and offers the user an answer to that query. Note that something very fundamental just changed: the interface (Siri) now controls how the query is executed, rather than the user (as is the case with a simple search at Google.com). So, if Apple chooses to direct Siri queries to Google, then Google controls the query. Leo noted that the internet was a “disintermediary”–it killed travel agents because users could simply make their reservations at the airline directly. Services like Siri are “re-intermediaries”– they insert themselves between the user and the search engine. So, theoretically, if a manufacturer like Apple can control the user interface (as is the case with Siri), Apple can control the search, thereby threatening Google.

Google’s Matt Cutts and Amit Singhal Talk About Upcoming Initiatives at Google

Matt Cutts, the head of Google’s spam team (he also authors and appears in Google’s Webmaster Central Channel Videos on YouTube), and Google’s Amit Singhal spoke at the commencement of the 2nd day of the session. Conferences like this are a great way to learn what Google thinks is important and how they value sites and decide rankings.

I ran into Matt Cutts at the Wynn Casino. He was gracious enough to spend a few minutes speaking with me and my wife.

Beside some expected disagreement with Leo Laporte’s earlier warning that Google was in big trouble, one particular highlight caught my attention:

Google Testing an “Above the Fold” Algorithm

Matt Cutts stated that Google was testing an “above the fold” algorithm change that “so far…looks pretty good.” The term “above the fold” refers, simply, to the top of a webpage. The term is inherited from the newspaper industry, the fold being the upward-facing part of the newspaper as it lays flat. This algorithm change would look for quality content at the top of a webpage. So, if a particular website were stuffed with ads, that website might not perform as well in search following the change. No word on if or when this will be implemented.

Some additional insights into search headed forward: Mobile search will continue to grow in importance, and Google will be working to continue to build quality in that area. Social sharing and activity will continue to be more important headed forward. Matt Cutts also proposed a way to protect the original creators of content from having that content stolen by scraper sites. He said that Google may soon begin allowing a notification system that works as follows: when new content is created by a website owner, the creator can ping Google with an alert that confirms that “I am the creator of this content and all other copies are not to be indexed and appear in search.” If implemented, this improvement will be a valuable tool for website owners. Matt also spoke about author reputation in search, noting that author reputation and authority can serve as a great measure of the value of content created by those authors.

General Ideas Presented at PubCon

From the broad pool of speakers, some general ideas emerged that present great opportunities for ranking, placement, and visibility headed forward.

Author Profiles in Search Results

This idea echos what Matt Cutts said about author reputation. In the screenshot below, you’ll note a screenshot image of some search results with a thumbnail photo of Matt Cutts and the text “by Matt Cutts – In 135,595 Google+ circles”. This is a recent search feature that links an author’s content to his or her Google+ profile.

This feature is easy to implement by tagging content with a link to each author’s Google+ profile. We’ll be rolling this out for our clients in upcoming weeks, and of course, we’ll be working with clients to help build out properly optimized Google+ profiles. It is also important to note that this connection between author profiles will add authority to the content and potentially can increase the ranking positions of such content. In a WordPress environment, this feature will apply to posts, but not to your commercial pages, and contact pages, etc.

The Power of Social Sharing

Another prominent theme at PubCon (the second PubCon in a row, actually) is the power of social sharing to increase ranking and visibility. Besides the obvious effect of gaining additional placement through the sharing of content (after all, if content is shared, that means other people will see it), sharing of content can serve as a signal to search engines that “this content is valuable” and “this site is a legitimate source of content.” Remember, Google’s mission is to filter out thin content and deliver valuable content in response to search queries. Social sharing continues to rise in importance as a ranking factor within Google and other search engines.

Site Value Over Page Value

Another topic discussed at PubCon was the continued shift in how Google values individual pages of content. Typically, in the page, Google would tend to rank an individual page based on the merits of that page: the page elements, keywords used, load speed, inbound links. More recently, Google is shifting its focus to the value of the site as a whole. And so, a loose collection of well-optimized pages will not perform as well as a website that has developed overall authority. Ways to achieve this? Start by removing weak content from your site–weak content can actually harm your valuable content by lowering the authority of the site as a whole. Also, social sharing, discussed above, can increase the authority and power of a site.

Free Local Listings for SEO

August 30, 2011/0 Comments/in SEO Resources/by Michael David

Local listings are an increasingly large part of search. Google places results now pop up at the top of search results automatically. This is good news for local businesses. If you have a physical location, you better take full advantage of the opportunity!

You should always start by claiming your business on Google Places, then work your way down by submitting information to Yahoo Local, YellowPages.com, and maybe even Bing Local. From there, you want to convince search engines that your business exists and is significant to users. To do that, you’ll have to submit to many alternate local directories.

In Chapter 9 of our book, SEO for WordPress, we talk about local listings and their explosive power in the hands of local businesses.

We at TastyPlacement have been scouring local directories to figure out which best factor into local rankings.

Directory Link Post speed Pictures Notes
Kudzu.com Yes Slow No
MojoPages.com Yes Immediate 4
SuperPages.com(search)
Supermedia.com(data entry)
Yes Moderate 4
InsiderPages.com Yes Immediate 4
ExpressUpdateUSA.com No Moderate No
advertise.local.com Yes Moderate No Upgrade to Premium to add pictures
local.botw.org Yes Moderate Logo only Must email a representative to edit mistakes
MerchantCircle.com Yes Immediate 4 Must email a representative for multiple listings
Hotfrog.com Yes Immediate 4
Yellowbook.com Yes Moderate No May require phone verification
Foursquare.com Yes Immediate No Customers can check-in
thinklocal.com Yes Moderate No
cityslick.net Yes Moderate No
USYellowPages.com No Slow No
MyCity.com Yes Immediate Logo only
BizJournals.com No Slow No
mapinsight.teleatlas.com/mapfeedback No Slow No Provides a tracking number
justclicklocal.com No Immediate No
DiscoverOurTown.com Yes Slow No
MetroBot.com No Moderate No
BestDealOn.com Yes Moderate No
Manta.com/claim Yes Immediate Logo only
Infignos.com No Slow No
Yellowassistance.com No Slow No
MyHuckleberry.com Yes Immediate 4
BrownBook.net/business/add Yes Immediate 4
CitySquares.com Yes Immediate No
Navteq.com No Slow No
CitySearch.com Yes Slow Logo only
Yellowee.com Yes Immediate Logo only
MatchPoint.com Yes Immediate 4
Mapquest.com Yes Moderate No They have a number of options for verification
Sustainlane.com No Immediate 4
Localprice.com Yes Slow No
Thumbtack.com Yes Immediate 4
Scrub the Web No Slow No
CommunityWalk.com Yes Immediate 4
ChamberofCommerce.com Yes Moderate 4

Are Site-wide H1 Tags in WordPress Good or Bad?

June 30, 2011/in Our Book: SEO for Wordpress, WordPress/by Michael David

Questions from Readers

The great thing about writing our book, WordPress 3.0 Search Engine Optimization, is we get to hear from all those readers who have taken our material and put it to work in the field. Today, we’ve got a fascinating question from Robert, who asks that question we confront every day in one way or another: Just how far should I trust Google’s sophistication?

Hi Michael,

I’m currently reading your Packt book on WordPress SEO, and I have a quick question about HTML5 and the way it uses header tags. Your book says to use only one H1 tag per page, which makes sense. However, HTML5 advocates multiple H1 tags per page, as long as each is contained in a separate section/header.

Worse yet, the first H1 tag on a page is usually a wrapper around the home link logo and contains the same meaningless title text on every page. You can see a typical example at CSS3maker.com :

<header>

<h1 id=”logo”><a href=”index.html” title=”CSS 3.0 Maker”>Css 3.0 Maker</a></h1>

</header>

Most SEO bloggers assume single H1 tags are a thing of the past. Based on your experience, has there been any evidence that Google/Yahoo interpret HTML5 content any differently than HTML/XHTML?

If not, should I remove the header and h1 tags around my logo anchor tag? My site looks like the CSS3maker code above. And like them, I don’t have anything else in my header, so if I remove the H1 tag, wouldn’t I also just scrap the header tag? I have a meaningful H2 tag in my content section, which could be elevated to an H1 tag.

Thanks,
Robert

BTW, I’m really enjoying your book.

 

Robert,

This may be a cop out…but does this help?

I think google is tuned in enough to ignore site-wide h1 tags. One of my philosophies is “packaging”–make it so brain-dead easy for a search engine that it can’t POSSIBLY get confused. We are sort of on-page nerds when it comes to that stuff. Most of the pages we create are pretty perfect, at least on the page.

Do we, in our SEO business, remove site-wide h1 tags around logos and site names in the header? Absolutely we do, but I don’t think it’s the kiss of death if you don’t. Remember one thing: google has to fit its algorithm so that it doesn’t punish sites for small mistakes–otherwise, it would punish 80% of the web or more.

I am very glad you are enjoying the book!

Michael

Buy the Book Today at Amazon

Book Excerpt: Creating Keyword-Rich Content

June 7, 2011/in Our Book: SEO for Wordpress/by Michael David

Our book, WordPress Search Engine Optimization (now in second edition!) is out on the stands of all the upscale local bookstores and online retailers in your neighborhood. But why buy before you try? Here’s one page out of the whole volume to give you a taste of the SEO tips and strategies that you’re missing. You can buy the book at Amazon.

Creating Keyword-Rich Content

It may seem unnatural to focus on a keyword when writing content for your website, but it is absolutely essential to write your pages in a manner that will get them ranked highly in the search engines. No matter how well-written your content is, if it doesn’t contain the keywords and phrases that people use to search for your product or service, it won’t show up in the search engine results pages and no one will ever see it.

For this reason, the first step to creating content for your site is to begin with the right keywords. We learned in Chapter 3 how to research keywords, find the big-money keywords and key phrases, and organize and prioritize them. With sound keyword research, writing flows naturally: start with the high-volume, high-value keywords and write high-quality content for your site that focuses on those keywords.

It’s best to target one keyword phrase or group of phrases per content page. Recall that keyword overlap can give us a close group of keywords such as “Miami AC” and “Miami AC repair.” In any case, keep your content very focused on a small group of words.

Whichever phrase or phrases you are targeting should be used several times within the body content. You should make sure to include the keyword phrase in the title and headings as well as a few times throughout the actual content. It is especially important to include your keyword phrase near the beginning of your content . Most search engines tend to give more weight to words and phrases that appear in the first few paragraphs of a web page. Remember that search engines determine the subject of your page from the words you use on the page. If you don’t use the keyword phrase often enough, your page will not rank for that phrase.

What this means is that if your page is selling book covers and you are targeting the keyword phrase “buy book covers,” that phrase needs to appear on the page in several places. First of all, it must be included in the title and somewhere in the first paragraph of the copy. In addition, you should try to work it into the rest of the copy at least two to three more times and into the headings that separate different sections of copy. You can also add the keyword phrase to the alt text for any photos that appear on the page.

Buy the Book Today at Amazon

Tutorial: How to Remove link rel=’prev’ and link rel=’next’ from WordPress Head

March 20, 2011/23 Comments/in WordPress/by Michael David

How to Remove link rel=’prev’ and link rel=’next’ from WordPress Head (in WP 3.0+)

WordPress, in its default state, prints a lot of excess code to the head section of webpages. One element that always annoyed me were two entries that always appeared:

<link rel='prev' title='' href='' />
<link rel='next' title='' href='' />

These entries are recommended for web usability for disabled persons–consider that before removing them. We were looking for a way to lean up our pages, though, so we thought we’d like to remove these entries. There are some outdated instructions in WP forums that will not work in WP 3.0; we tried several approaches, but nothing worked.

In your WordPress template, you’ll find your functions.php file. Open that file and enter the following line.

remove_action( 'wp_head', 'adjacent_posts_rel_link_wp_head', 10, 0 );

This “filter,” as it is called, will tell WordPress not to generate the link rel=’prev’ and link rel=’next’ lines in the WordPress head.

Just a note on why those outdated instructions wouldn’t work with WP 3.0. The filter we created instructs WP to turn off the action titled “adjacent_posts_rel_link_wp_head.” Our commands works in WP 3.0 and above because the former action prior to 3.0 was titled “adjacent_posts_rel_link.”

 

WordPress Stripping iFrame Elements? Here’s the Fix.

February 18, 2011/18 Comments/in Programming & PHP, WordPress/by Michael David

Elements like Google Map embeds get stripped out. Here’s the Fix.

If you have ever tried to enter a Google Map embed into a WordPress page or post, you’ve noticed that switching between “Visual” and “HTML” view in the page or post edit window strips the iFrame out–leaving you with broken code that displays nothing. Luckily, there is a fix.

You’ll need to find the functions.php file in your active theme folder. It’s a standard WordPress file, so it’ll be there. Next, we are going to add two short functions that change the way the WordPress editor handles iFrame code. You’ll want to insert the following lines of code before the closing “?>”  of your functions.php file.

// this function initializes the iframe elements 

function add_iframe($initArray) {
$initArray['extended_valid_elements'] = "iframe[id|class|title|style|align|frameborder|height|longdesc|marginheight|marginwidth|name|scrolling|src|width]";
return $initArray;
}

// this function alters the way the WordPress editor filters your code
add_filter('tiny_mce_before_init', 'add_iframe');

That’s it. You can test your mod by entering some iFrame code in the editor window and switching between  the visual and HTML editor.

Facebook and Twitter Can Help Your Rankings

December 2, 2010/0 Comments/in Social Media Marketing/by Michael David

It’s Official: Facebook and Twitter Can Help Your Website’s Organic Rankings

In a thorough and well-research article, Danny Sullivan, search guru at SearchEngineLand.com, discovered that who you are one social media sites like Twitter and Facebook can have a positive impact on your website’s rankings. In other words, a visible and robust presence on social media sites can serve as a signal to Google and Bing that the principle content on your website is rankworthy.

Among the highlights of the article are the following conclusions:

  • Bing says that “We do look at the social authority of a user.” Bing continues that it looks at how many people a social media user follows and how many people follow that user in turn and that result can “add a little weight to a listing in regular search results.”
  • Google admits the same, saying, “Yes, we do use it as a signal . . . in our organic and news rankings.”
  • Google and Bing admit that high-authority users on social media sites will impact the organic rankings of links they point to.
  • Both search engines use the number of tweets/retweets and Facebook “shares” of a particular page as a ranking factor for that particular page.
  • A link to a website that appears both in Twitter and Facebook is seen (at least by Bing) as more legitimate and rankworthy.

Does Google Hate Forum Sites? Millions of Pages Disappear From Index

October 9, 2010/0 Comments/in SEO/by Michael David

Millions of Pages Disappear From Index (or Do They?)

We at TastyPlacement have noticed that millions of pages of popular forums sites have disappeared from Google’s index in the past few months. Testing the index, a Google search for the custom string “site:forums.digitalpoint.com,” which would normally return tens of millions of pages, returns only 256,000 results. Similarly, the tremendously popular forum site, fanforum.com, shows only 58,000 indexed pages in Google. Typically the “site:” search query generates a reliable count of the number of pages indexed by Google for a particular domain.

Testing in other niches shows that the trend is broad: ClubLexus.com shows only 57,000 indexed pages–a narrow fraction of its total page count. If you prowl around, you’ll see the same thing: notebookforums.com, sitepoint.com, every forum site I checked gave the same result.

Here’s the kicker: all of the pages within these forums sites appear to be searchable–the pages are indexed and searchable but not reported as indexed,

Hmmm…not sure how to parse this but it could reflect Google making a formal, algorithmic devaluation in the way it treats forums pages. This change might mean that links on those forum pages would be significantly devalued.

SEO Master Class: The Mathematics and Operation of Google PageRank

October 4, 2010/0 Comments/in Our Book: SEO for Wordpress/by Michael David

The following is an excerpt (with some recent modifications and editorial comments) from our book, WordPress Search Engine Optimization. You can buy the book at Amazon.

The Mathematics and Operation of Google PageRank

Google’s PageRank is part of its search algorithm; the other search engines’ ranking algorithms work similarly. Yahoo and Bing, while they obviously measure inbound link counts as a ranking factor, do not disclose to web users any measure of page value equivalent to PageRank. PageRank works through complex mathematics. Understanding the mathematical intricacies is not vital, but can help illuminate how PageRank impacts your link building efforts. PageRank works the same on all platforms, WordPress or otherwise.

The PageRank Calculation

PageRank calculations works as follows: Google assigns a numerical value to each indexed page on the Web. When an indexed page hyperlinks to another page on the Web a portion of that numerical value is passed from the linking page to the destination page, thereby increasing the destination page’s PageRank. Inbound links increase the PageRank of your web pages and outbound links decrease PageRank. PageRank, often abbreviated as “PR,” is expressed as a number from 0 to 10. Google.com and Facebook.com, both of which benefit from millions of inbound links, enjoy a PageRank of 10. In common parlance, a PageRank 10 site is referred to as a “PR10 site.” Remember though that PageRank refers to pages on the web, not just sites themselves. A PR5 site simply means that the site’s front page is a PR5.

So how is PageRank specifically calculated? Every indexed page on the web enjoys a small amount of PageRank on its own, a PageRank score of 1. This inherent PageRank is the original source of all PageRank on the web; it is only through linking between pages and sites that some pages accumulate higher PageRank than others. However, a page can never send all of its PageRank to other pages—this is where the damping factor comes into play. The damping factor is simply a number between 0 and 1 (but think of it as zero to 100 on a percentage scale); it represents the amount of PageRank that can be sent away from a page when that page links out to other pages.

If a search algorithm’s damping factor were set to zero, no page would ever send PageRank away, and the entire PageRank calculation becomes pointless. On the other hand, if the damping factor is set to 1, then 100% of a page’s PageRank is sent away through outbound linking, and any page with any outbound links retains no PageRank. In this case, the algorithm also fails—the internet would be populated entirely sites of either PR0 or PR10 with no sites in between. As it happens, the damping factor employed by Google is widely believed to be .85. This means that 85% of a page’s PageRank is available to be passed to other pages through linking, while 15% of a page’s PageRank will always be retained. It is believed that Google can alter the damping factor for particular sites.

Consider for a moment that Google manages PageRank calculations for billions of web pages. If that wasn’t daunting enough, consider that Google undertakes the even more staggering task of managing the mathematical calculations of immeasurable numbers of links between those billions of sites.

PageRank, Diagramatically

This graphical illustration of Pagerank calculations for a hypothetical group of web pages shows that the PageRank distribution is accumulated in site “B” because it enjoys a high number of links. The sites represented by the small circles at the bottom of the illustration retain only 1.6% of the PageRank distribution because they link outward and have no inbound links. Note also that site “C” enjoys a healthy amount of PageRank simply because it enjoys a single link from site “B.”

You Have to Share Your PageRank

Also bear in mind that the amount of PageRank available to be passed by a page will be equally divided among all the outbound links on that page. So, if a webpage has a total of six links: three internal links and three external links (links to outside websites) then the PageRank passed away by that page will be shared equally among the six links on that page.

What does that mean for the link builder? Well, it means that if you have secured a link on a great PR4 page, but that page has 200 outbound links, then you’ll be sharing the available PageRank with 199 other sites. That’s why you want to seek out pages with low numbers of outbound links. When there are fewer outbound links, your link will enjoy a much greater percentage of the available PageRank.

The Logarithmic PageRank Scale

If the mathematics underlying PageRank weren’t complicated enough, there is another facet that you must consider. The PageRank scale of PR1 to PR10 isn’t linear, it is logarithmic. Therefore, it takes ten times as much linking power to rise from a PR2 to a PR3 page. Expressed another way, a PR4 page has 100 times the linking power of a PR2 page. As each level of PageRank is reached, it becomes harder and harder to reach the next level. There are only about 120 to 150 PR10 pages at any given time, and generally this elite class of pages and sites includes Google.com, Microsoft.com, WhiteHouse.gov, and other sites of equivalent popularity and character.

PageRank Is Historical

PageRank is historical and only updated every three months or so (although sometimes much longer periods pass between PageRank updates, it’s really up to the whim of Google)—when you check the PageRank of a page, you aren’t seeing the current PageRank, you are seeing the PageRank reported as of the last PageRank update.

Buy the Book Today at Amazon

Page 2 of 41234

Tutorials & Case Studies

  • Analytics
  • Backlink Strategies
  • Case Studies
  • Infographics
  • Internet Marketing
  • Local Maps and Local Listings
  • Magento
  • Mobile SEO
  • Our Book: SEO for Wordpress
  • PPC
  • Programming & PHP
  • SEO
  • SEO Power Tools
  • SEO Resources
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Updates & News
  • Web Design
  • WordPress

Our Most Recent Tutorials & Case Studies

  • Test Results: How to Stop Google Re-Writing Your Title Tags in the SERPs
  • Pro Tip: Track Your Website Goals in Google Analytics (and More)
  • How to Connect Google DataStudio to MySQL Database (cPanel Flavor)
  • UTM Codes/Tags: A Quick Guide to Tagging Ads Like a Pro
  • Social Media Case Study: Hundreds of New Customers From Core Facebook Campaign

Search

Archives & Tutorial Categories

  • Analytics
  • Backlink Strategies
  • Case Studies
  • Infographics
  • Internet Marketing
  • Local Maps and Local Listings
  • Magento
  • Mobile SEO
  • Our Book: SEO for Wordpress
  • PPC
  • Programming & PHP
  • SEO
  • SEO Power Tools
  • SEO Resources
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Updates & News
  • Web Design
  • WordPress

Austin SEO Company, TastyPlacement

TastyPlacement
4150 Freidrich Ln Ste C
Austin, TX 78744
Tel: (512) 535-2492

Google Maps: Get Directions or Read Our Awesome Reviews

Quick Navigation: Our Most Important Pages

  • Austin SEO [Home]
  • WordPress SEO Service
  • PPC Management
  • Social Media Marketing
  • Analytics and Monitoring
  • Remarketing Experts
  • Conversion Rate Optimization
© Copyright - TastyPlacement. Made in Austin, Texas
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Scroll to top